Abstract Guidelines
Select A topics
Before submitting your abstract, you are required to select the main category of the session, where you would like to present your paper.
Select A topics
Before submitting your abstract, you are required to select the main category of the session, where you would like to present your paper.
Select A topics
Before submitting your abstract, you are required to select the main category of the session, where you would like to present your paper.
PROPOSAL / ABSTRACT STRUCTURE
Proposals/Abstracts should be no longer than one A4 page in portrait layout.
The title of the proposals/abstracts should be as concise as possible and should appear in bold, sentence cased and centered
Co-authors/presenter and affiliations below the title should be in Italics (the main author’s name should be underlined, and the name of the presenting author should be marked with an asterisk (*).
The proposal/abstract must be written in the most preferable language, i.e. English, and content should have a maximum character of 300 words.
Investors and Venture Capitalists
The main body of the proposal/abstract should be in Times New Roman, Font size 12, Justified, Line spacing 1.5.
References, denoted by superscript numbers in the text should be listed at the end of the text followed by Year, Volume, and Page.
The use of figures, graphs, and schemes is recommended where this aids the understanding of the text.
Proposals/Abstracts should be submitted in MS Word or PDF format, either via email attachment to summit email with the subject line ‘summit name abstract’ or online submission method via the summit website.
Please include the full details of the main author/presenter and the presenting author in the email and indicate whether you are submitting an Oral or a Poster Presentation.
Note: There is a 1 MB limit for online abstract submission if you’re abstract is larger than 1 MB, and then you are recommended to send it via email as an attachment.
A confirmation mail will be sent in regards & receiving your abstract, and if the submitter does not receive any mail within the next 24 Hrs, he/she is suggested to contact the respective summit coordinator, manager, or ambassador.
We firmly believe that ethical conduct is the most essential virtual of any academic, hence any act of plagiarism is totally unaccepted, and academic misconduct will not be tolerated.
Requirements
The summit is soliciting literature review, survey, business case study and research papers and comments including, whilst not limited to, the following areas of interest:
- Decentralization
- DAO Decentralized Autonomous Organizations
- Crypto Currency
- DeFi: Decentralized Finance
- Artists with NFTs: Non-Fungible Tokens
- Blockchain infrastructure technology for web 3.0
- Extendibility in Web 3.0
- Web 3.0 and the Metaverse
- Cybersecurity with the web 3.0
- Data privacy and security issues of digital wallet
- Navigating the Digital frontiers: AI’s transformation of industries and society
- AI Leveraging Financial Inclusions
- Leading AI in Business Transformation
- AI Automation
Submission Deadlines
Download Format
The Summit Offers Two Option For Abstract Submission
Option-1 : Academic
Suited for research conducted in academic disciplines. Check a sample abstract for this option here. Abstracts submitted under the first option should contain concise statements of:
Backgrounds: Indicate the purpose and objective of the research, the hypothesis that was tested, or a description of the problem being analyzed or evaluated.
Methods: Describe (the study period/ setting/location, study design, study population, data collection, and methods of analysis used.
Results: Present as clearly and in as much detail as possible the findings/outcome of the study. Please summarize any specific results.
Conclusions: Explain the significance of your findings/outcomes of the research about Web 3.0 & AI and/or support, and Future Implications of the results.
The following review criteria will be used in scrolling abstracts submitted under Option 1:
Is there a clear background and justified objective?
Is the methodology/study design appropriate for the objectives?
Are the results important and clearly presented?
Are the conclusions supported by the results?
Is the study original, and does it contribute to the field?
Option-2 : Business/Public
Backgrounds: Summarize the purpose, scope, and objectives, of the program, project, or policy.
Lessons Learned: Present as clearly and in as much detail as possible the methods/findings/outcomes of the programme, project or policy; include analytic approaches, evaluation of lessons learned, and best practices with a succinct description of the methods used, in addition, please summarize any specific results that specifically support your conclusions of lessons learned and best practices.
Results: Present as clearly and in as much detail as possible the findings/outcome of the study. Please summarize any specific results.
Conclusions: Explain the significance of the methods used and findings/outcomes of the programme, project, or policy for Web 3.0 & AI and /or support, and future implications of the results.
PEER-REVIEW PROCESS:
READY TO SUBMIT PAPERS?
